The impact of living modified organisms (LMOs) on non-target insects is a major ecological risk associated with the release of LMOs into the environment (Conner et al., 2003). Transgenes or their associated metabolites may directly flow into insects through transgenic plants. Their accumulation in insects may successively influence upper trophic levels of the food chain including birds and mam mals. Many studies have reported effects of LMOs on target or non-target insects in the context of risk assessments, particularly effects of insect-resistant transgenic plants (Chen et al., 2006; Duan et al., 2002; Ferry et al., 2007; Sharma Pampapathy, 2006). In addition, researchers have also explored changes in biodiversity and composition of insect communities under the influence of transgenic plants (Dively, 2005; Whitehouse et al., 2005).

In Korea, LMOs are managed by seven government agencies according to their use. The Ministry of Environment (MOE) oversees the import and export of LMOs used for environmental remediation and reviews the risk to natural ecosystems posed by LMOs that may be released into the environment (LMO Environmental Safety Center (LESC), 2021; Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE), 2017). The National Institute of Ecology (NIE) supports the MOE’s LMO safety management efforts by operating an LMO risk review agency and an LMO risk assessment institute (Lee et al., 2015; Nam et al., 2019). Worldwide, LMOs have been commercialized owing to their resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, altered growth and product quality, and ability to control pollination systems (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA), 2021). In Korea, most LMOs have been approved for food and agricultural use, with only a small number of LMOs approved for industrial, health, and medical purposes (Korea Biosafety Clearing House (KBCH), 2021). LMOs for environmental remediation have not yet been commercialized worldwide. However, as the development of LMOs for environmental remediation is increasing globally, it is necessary to prepare guidelines for safety management of such LMOs prior to their commercial use (Aken, 2009; Bennett et al., 2003; James Strand, 2009).

Unlike LMOs intended for use as human or animal food, LMOs used for environmental remediation can negatively impact other trophic levels in the food chain since they can be applied in a variety of contaminated sites. Butt et al. (2018) have reported that bioaccumulation of heavy metals along a soil, plant berseem (Triofolium alexandrinum), herbivorous insect aphid (Sitobion avenae), and predatory insect beetle (Coccinella septempunctata) food chain. In a food chain consisting of mustard (Brassica juncea), aphid (Lipaphis erysimi), and beetle (Coccinella septempunctata ), Zn is biomagnified from mustard to beetles whereas Cd is bioconcentrated in aphids at the second trophic level, but not in beetles at the third trophic level (Dar et al., 2017). Zhang et al. (2009) have demonstrated that herbivorous insects Eligma narcissus and Holotrichia can accumulate considerable amounts of heavy metals including Hg, Cd, and Pb from their host plants. Furthermore, the mobility of Cd and Cu from leaves in mulberry (Morus alba L.) to larva of silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) in the food chain is elevated with increasing concentrations of these metals in the soil (Prince et al., 2001). These findings suggest a more significant bioaccumulation of environmental pollutants at upper trophic levels of ecosystems treated with LMOs that accumulate or migrate environmental pollutants. Consequently, careful considerations of these risks are required to assess the effect of LMOs used for environmental remediation on insect ecosystems.

To support commercial application of LMOs for environmental remediation in Korea, the NIE must establish appropriate risk assessment guidelines to facilitate MOE’s LMO safety management system (Nam et al., 2019; 2020; Nam Han, 2020). Toward this end, the main objective of this study was to evaluate potential risks posed by LMOs used for environmental remediation and ultimately establish a standard for preserving the biological diversity of natural ecosystems treated by those LMOs. Sunflowers (Heli anthus annuus L.) are promising candidates for phytoremediation of inorganic and organic contaminants in water and soil (Prasad, 2007; Rizwan et al., 2016). Here, we investigated the biodiversity and composition of arthropod communities in a sunflower field as a reference. Our findings could support the development of LMO risk assessment guidelines for environmental remediation.

Materials and Methods

Field experiment

Field experiments were conducted in a confined field 36°01′44.81′′ N, 126°43′20.5′′ E) located at the NIE, Seocheon-gun, Korea (Nam et al., 2020). The sunflower cultivar used for this study was a standard "Jaeraejongja" type that could grow to a height of 1.6 - 1.8 m (Danong Co., Namyangju, Korea). Three randomized plots were established. Each plot had a size of 11.2 × 10 m. Seeds were sown directly into the soil at 0.6 × 0.8 m intervals in April 2020. A total of 360 plants were set up. Prior to sowing, all plots were fertilized with N, P, and K at rates of 6.1, 19.3, and 13.5 kg per 10 acres, respectively. Sunflowers were cultivated based on crop technology guidelines provided by the Rural Development Administration of Korea (Nongsara, 2020).

Phenotypic characteristics of sunflowers were examined using 10 individuals per plot. Plant height was measured from the place where the stem appeared above the soil to the tallest part of the plant. Stem diameter was determined for the stem that left the soil using a vernier caliper. Total numbers of leaves and flowers were counted. Flower size was measured as the diameter of the largest flower for each plant. Air temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, and daylight-hour data were obtained from the daily weather report provided by the Gunsan Meteorological Station (36°00′19.1′′ N, 126°45′40.9′′ E) (Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA), 2020). Meteorological data averaged over 30 years (1991–2020) were also acquired (KMA, 2020).

Arthropod sampling, identifcation, and classifcation

Arthropods in each plot of sunflower fields were sampled four times at 2–3 week-intervals, covering the period from sunflower anthesis to seed maturity (Fig. 1). The growth stage of sunflowers was classified according to the method of Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC, 2017). The first sampling was performed during the R3 phase at 62 days after sowing when the flower bud was formed. The second sampling was performed during the R5.8 flowering stage on day 82 after sowing. The third sampling was performed during the R7 seed-filling phase at 97 days after sowing. The fourth sampling was performed during the R9 seed physiological maturity stage at 116 days post-sowing.

새창으로 보기
Fig. 1.
Representative photographs of sunflowers at each sampling date.

Arthropod samples were collected using an insect net and suction trap. Manned observation was performed using a sticky trap. All species that frequently appeared in sunflower-cultivated fields were targeted. Collection was conducted 20 times per plot using a 40-cm-diameter insect net with a sweeping and beating method. Arthropod suction was performed for sunflower plants from top to bottom using an engine-type aspirator and suction pipe. For flying insects, a total of 24 sticky traps 25 × 15 cm, Iljintype Co., Gimhae, Korea) were installed in the field for each sampling period.

Arthropods collected from each plot were put into a ziplock bag, transferred to the laboratory, and identified through visual observation using a stereoscopic microscope (SZX16; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and stored by liquid immersion in 95% ethanol. Identified arthropods were finally classified using the national species database of Korea (National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), 2020) and other insect illustrated books.

Statistical analyses

Arthropod biodiversity was analyzed by calculating the McNaughton’s dominance index (McNaughton, 1967), Margalef species richness index (Margalef, 1958), Shannon-Weaver diversity index (Pielou, 1966), and Pielou’s species evenness index (Pielou, 1975). The effect of sampling date on arthropod biodiversity was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using STATISTICA (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). Statistically significant differences between means were identified using Duncan’s multiple range test (p 0.05). Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) were used to compare changes in arthropod communities according to sampling data and method using Primer 6 version 6.1.13 and Permanova+ version 1.0.3 software (PRIMER-E Ltd., Plymouth, UK).


Phenotypic characteristics of sunfowers

Changes in meteorological conditions at the field site were monitored over the entire experimental period (Fig. 2). Average temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, and daylight hours from sowing date to sunflower harvest time were 20.8°C, 8.9 mm, 80.5%, and 6.1 h, respectively. Temperature, relative humidity, and daylight hours were similar to mean values over a 30-year period at the field site. However, the average precipitation during the experimental periods increased by 61.8% compared to the 30- year average. In particular, the number of precipitation days in July corresponding to the flowering stage and physi ological maturity of seeds was greatly elevated.

Overall, phenotypic characteristics of sunflowers including stem diameter, numbers of leaves and flowers per plant, and flower size did not differ significantly according to the growth stage (Table 1). However, plant heights of sunflowers at R5.8 and R7 phases were 47.5% and 38.6% taller than those at the R3 phase, respectively.

새창으로 보기
Fig. 2.
Meteorological characteristics during experimental periods. Weekly air temperature and precipitation (A) and relative humidity and daylight hours (B) are shown. Data were obtained from the daily weather report of the Gunsan Meteorological Station (36°00′ 19.1′′ N, 126°45′40.9′′ E)(KMA, 2020).
새창으로 보기
Table 1.
Phenotypic characteristics of sunflowers at different growth stages
Parameters p-value Jun 09 (R3) Jul 01 (R5.8) Jul 16 (R7) Aug 04 (R9)
Plant height (cm) 0.001 86.7 ± 4.1c 128.0 ± 5.8a 120.3 ± 8.8a 105.7 ± 7.2b
Stem diameter (cm) 0.698 2.4 ± 0.4a 2.8 ± 0.5a 2.8 ± 0.6a 2.8 ± 0.5a
No. of leaves / plant 0.134 28.7 ± 3.9a 39.0 ± 8.2a 45.7 ± 12.2a -
No. of flowers / plant 0.614 - 5.0 ± 3.3a 7.4 ± 3.4a 4.9 ± 3.2a
Flower size (cm) 0.434 - 25.7 ± 1.9a 26.1 ± 4.4a 22.6 ± 3.4a

Data are presented as means ± standard deviations (n = 3). P-values are based on one-way ANOVA. Values within rows followed by the same letters are not significantly different at p 0.05 per Duncan’s test.

Changes in distribution of arthropod species according to growth stage of sunfowers

A total of 2,350 arthropod individuals including insects and spiders were collected from sunflower-cultivated fields. They belonged to 10 orders, 71 families, and 134 species (Table 2). Numbers of individuals collected during R3, R5.8, R7, and R9 phases were 638, 468, 638, and 606, respectively. During the R3 phase, individuals from four orders (Araneae, Hemiptera, Coleoptera, and Diptera) of arthropods accounted for 78.0% of total families and 82.0% of total species. Among these arthropods, 247 Diptera (38.7%), 188 Coleoptera (29.5%), and 160 Hemiptera (25.1%) individuals made these overwhelmingly dominant orders, accounting for over 93.3% of total arthropods captured. Among total samples collected at the R5.8 phase, Hemiptera, Coleoptera, and Araneae accounted for the largest proportion of arthropods, representing 37.3%, 18.6%, and 15.3% of total species, respectively. The most prevalent order, Hemiptera, had 255 individuals, accounting for more than half of total arthropods collected. The abundance of Hemiptera, Araneae, and Coleoptera, which constituted about 37.3%, 18.6%, and 16.9% of the total species, respectively, was higher during phase R7. A total of 520 Hemiptera individuals (81.5% of total individuals) belonged to 11 (31.4%) families and 22 (37.3%) species. The R9 phase showed a similar pattern to the R7 phase. During the R9 phase, numbers of species and individuals in the order of Hemiptera were 21 (51.2% of total species) and 531 (87.6% of total individuals), respectively.

새창으로 보기
Table 2.
Numbers of species and individuals of each arthropod order surveyed at each sampling date
Sampling date (Growth stage) Order No. of Families No. of species % of species No. of individuals % of individuals
Jun 11 (R3) Araneae 6 8 13.1 9 1.4
Lepidoptera 3 4 6.6 7 1.1
Hemiptera 9 17 27.9 160 25.1
Coleoptera 10 18 29.5 188 29.5
Orthoptera 1 1 1.6 1 0.2
Hymenoptera 4 5 8.2 25 3.9
Odonata 1 1 1.6 1 0.2
Diptera 7 7 11.5 247 38.7
Subtotal no. 41 61 100.0 638 100.0
Jul 01 (R5.8) Araneae 5 9 15.3 21 4.5
Lepidoptera 4 5 8.5 20 4.3
Hemiptera 13 22 37.3 255 54.5
Coleoptera 7 11 18.6 71 15.2
Hymenoptera 3 4 6.8 64 13.7
Odonata 2 2 3.4 2 0.4
Dermaptera 1 1 1.7 1 0.2
Diptera 4 4 6.8 33 7.1
Chrysopidae 1 1 1.7 1 0.2
Subtotal no. 40 59 100.0 468 100.0
Jul 16 (R7) Araneae 6 11 18.6 43 6.7
Lepidoptera 2 2 3.4 11 1.7
Hemiptera 11 22 37.3 520 81.5
Coleoptera 5 10 16.9 39 6.1
Orthoptera 3 4 6.8 4 0.6
Hymenoptera 2 3 5.1 13 2.0
Odonata 2 2 3.4 3 0.5
Diptera 4 5 8.5 5 0.8
Subtotal no. 35 59 100.0 638 100.0
Aug 04 (R9) Araneae 5 11 26.8 34 5.6
Lepidoptera 1 1 2.4 2 0.3
Hemiptera 11 21 51.2 531 87.6
Coleoptera 2 5 12.2 29 4.8
Orthoptera 1 1 2.4 2 0.3
Odonata 1 1 2.4 1 0.2
Diptera 1 1 2.4 7 1.2
Subtotal no. 22 41 100.0 606 100.0
Total no. 71 134 2350

The abundance of ten most predominantly observed arthropod species in each growth stage of sunflowers is displayed in Table 3. Among arthropod species, Chironomidae sp. (Diptera; Chironomidae—decomposer insect guild) showed the highest occurrence (37.3%), followed by Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera; Coccinellidae) of a predatory insect guild and Nysius plebejus (Hemiptera; Lygaeidae) of a herbivorous insect guild (accounting for 14.4% and 14.3%, respectively). In the R5.8 phase, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera; Apidae) of a pollinator guild showed the highest density at 11.8%. Subsequently, herbivorous insects Dolycoris baccarum (Hemiptera; Pentatomi dae), Adelp-hocoris suturalis (Hemiptera; Miridae), N. plebejus, and Cletus punctiger (Hemiptera; Coreidae) accounted for 11.3%, 11.3%, 7.9%, and 7.9%, respectively. Pochazia shantungensis (Hemiptera; Ricaniidae) and D. baccarum were dominant species during the R7 phase, accounting for 27.1% and 14.9%, respectively. In addition, Corythucha marmorata (Hemiptera; Tingidae), Nysius hidakai Nakatani (Hemiptera; Lygaeidae), and Cicadellidae sp. (Hemiptera; Cicadellidae) accounted for 6.9%, 5.5%, and 5.0%, respectively. During phase R9, P. shantungensis of the herbivorous group was the most abundant one, accounting for 71.9%.

새창으로 보기
Table 3.
Abundance of ten most-observed arthropod species on each sampling date
Jun 11 (R3) Jul 01 (R5.8) Jul 16 (R7) Aug 04 (R9)
1 Chironomidae sp. 37.3% Apis mellifera 11.8% Pochazia shantungensis 27.1% Pochazia shantungensi 71.9%
2 Harmonia axyridis 14.4% Dolycoris baccarum 11.3% Dolycoris baccarum 14.9% Nysius plebejus 2.5%
3 Nysius plebejus 14.3% Adelphocoris suturalis 11.3% Corythucha marmorata 6.9% Nysius hidakai Nakatani 2.3%
4 Nonarthra cyanea 3.9% Nysius plebejus 7.9% Nysius hidakai Nakatani 5.5% Plagiodera versicolora 2.3%
5 Coccinella septempunctata 3.4% Cletus punctiger 7.9% Cicadellidae sp. 5.0% Dolycoris baccarum 2.0%
6 Propylea japonica 2.5% Apolygus lucorum 6.4% Adelphocoris suturalis 4.5% Propylea japonica 1.7%
7 Athalia rosae ruficornis 2.4% Chironomidae sp. 6.2% Apolygus lucorum 3.3% Chlorita flavescens 1.7%
8 Malachius prolongatus 2.2% Harmonia axyridis 4.5% Yemma exilis 3.0% Psammotettix striata 1.5%
9 Apolygus lucorum 2.2% Propylea japonica 3.2% Chlorita flavescens 3.0% Tipulidae sp. 1.2%
10 Adelphocoris suturalis 1.9% Coccinella septempunctata 2.8% Nysius plebejus 2.4% Eurydema dominulus 1.2%
Analysis of biodiversity and arthropod community composition

In this study, the McNaughton’s dominance index (McNaughton, 1967), Margalef species richness index (Margalef, 1958), Shannon-Weaver diversity index, and Pielou’s species evenness index (Pielou, 1975) were compared to determine differences in biodiversity of arthropod communities according to sunflower growth stage (Table 4). The dominance index of the arthropod community was significantly higher at phase R9 than that at other phases. By contrast, indices for richness and diversity were significantly greater at phases R3, R5.8, and R7 phases than at phase R9. The evenness index showed no significant differences (p = 0.075) according to sunflower growth stage.

새창으로 보기
Table 4.
Analyses of arthropod communities surveyed on each sampling date
Indices p-value Jun 11 (R3) Jul 01 (R5.8) Jul 16 (R7) Aug 04 (R9)
Dominance index 0.007 0.26 ± 0.27b 0.03 ± 0.01b 0.12 ± 0.08b 0.66 ± 0.17a
Richness index 0.049 7.70 ± 0.59a 7.27 ± 0.44a 7.24 ± 0.51a 5.37 ± 1.54b
Diversity index 0.041 3.22 ± 0.11a 3.26 ± 0.10a 3.23 ± 0.13a 2.64 ± 0.45b
Evenness index 0.075 0.92 ± 0.02a 0.95 ± 0.01a 0.94 ± 0.02a 0.87 ± 0.06a

Data are presented as means ± standard deviations (n = 3). P-values are based on one-way ANOVA. Values within rows followed by the same letters are not significantly different at p 0.05 per Duncan’s test.

NMDS analysis showed distinct groups depending on sampling dates and methods (Fig. 3). In addition, PERMANOVA indicated that the structure and composition of arthropod communities significantly varied based on sampling date (p = 0.001), sampling method (p = 0.001), and interactions between sampling date and sampling method (p = 0.001) (Table 5).

새창으로 보기
Fig. 3.
Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plot of Bray–Curtis community dissimilarities based on arthropod species surveyed at each sampling date with different sampling methods (stress value = 0.139). Square, direct observation using an insect net and suction trap; Circle, manned observation using a sticky trap


The diversity and composition of arthropods in the field are primary components of ecological risk assessments for transgenic plants because they reflect relationships between organisms and the environment (Wang Guan, 2020). Many studies have reported no significant differences in arthropod communities between transgenic and non-transgenic plant fields, suggesting that transgenic plants present a low risk of negative consequen (Chen et al., 2006; Oh et al., 2018; Zuo et al., 2018). However, in one study, although no cumulative effect was observed after two consecutive years of investigation in the field, transgenic maize expressing phytase showed a significant decrease in the number of species belonging to the herbivorous group compared to the number in non-transgenic maize fields (Wang Guan, 2020). Here, we monitored the abundance and composition of arthropod communities in a field cultivated with sunflowers that were candidates for use in environmental remediation. Results showed that the number of families and species of arthropods was reduced in phase R9, whereas the number of individuals declined in the R5.8 phase. Furthermore, the dominance index of arthropod communities was significantly higher in phase R9 than in other phases, whereas richness and diversity indices were considerably lower in phage R9.

Numerous studies have reported a significant correlation between seasonal variation and arthropod abundance (Campuzano et al., 2020; Shakir Ahmed, 2015). Climatic factors are directly related to seasonal changes. They can influence the population and community dynamics of insects including their survival, fecundity, and development (Khaliq et al., 2014). The average precipitation during our experiment was elevated by 61.8% compared to the 30-year mean, especially in the period from plant flowering to physiological maturity of seeds. Shakir and Ahmed (2015) have found that high soil temperatures and low relative humidity can elevate the abundance of soil arthropods, while total rainfall is not correlated with their abundance. Zhu et al. (2014) have indicated that increased or decreased precipitation can significantly alter the biomass of the whole plant community and lead to changes in insect diversity and trophic structure, especially in herbivores. Combined with these results, our research suggests the importance of long-term field trials over several years under different seasons and weather conditions to draw valid conclusions about the impact of these factors on insect ecosystems.

새창으로 보기
Table 5.
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) results for arthropod species surveyed at each sampling date with different sampling methods
Source DF1 SS2 MS3 F4 P5
Sampling date 3 21288 7096.1 5.872 0.001
Sampling method 1 14072 14072.0 11.644 0.001
Date × Method 3 13289 4429.6 3.666 0.001
Res 16 19335 1208.4 - -
Total 23 67984 - - -

DF1: degrees of freedom; SS2: sum of squares; MS3: mean square; F4: F-statistic; P5: P-value.

A major ecological concern about the environmental release of transgenic plants for environmental remediation is bioaccumulation of pollutants into higher trophic levels of the food chain from transgenic plants (Peralta-Videa et al., 2009). Butt et al. (2018) have reported that the accumulation of Zn, Cd, and Pb from host plants is much higher in grasshopper Ailopus thalassinus than in aphid S. avenae owing to different feeding behaviors such as sucking vs. chewing of these two insects. Zhang et al. (2009) have demonstrated that considerable amounts of Hg, Cd, and Pb are accumulated in carnivorous insects in the Locusta migratoria manilensis–spider and –mantis food chain, but not in the Acrida Chinensis–spider and – mantis food chain. These studies suggest that the bioaccumulation of heavy metal in insects can vary by feeding style, species, and type of pollutants. In the present study, dominant insects differed greatly according to the growth stage of sunflowers. Therefore, bioaccumulation of environmental pollutants should be considered at various plant growth stages to effectively assess the risk posed by transgenic plants used for environmental remediation.

The abundance of arthropods collected from fields is also influenced by collection methods, including sweeping, beating, hand collecting, vacuum sampling, branch clipping, chemical knockdown, and sticky trapping (Moir et al., 2005). Different collection methods can result in differences in the effort and efficacy of arthropod biodiversity investigations, such as differences in species and individual numbers, the time spent to collect and sort samples, and damage to plants (Swart et al., 2017). Our NMDS and PERMANOVA results showed that the composition of arthropod communities was significantly affected by whether direct or indirect sampling methods were employed and by the growth stage of sunflowers. Therefore, it is important to select an optimal method for arthropod collection depending on the objective of each study (Yi et al., 2012).

Previous studies have revealed that stress conditions can alter the accumulation of key metabolites in host plants and subsequently influence metabolite profiles, growth, and reproduction of insects at higher trophic levels (Nam et al., 2017). Accordingly, in addition to accumulation of environmental pollutants, abiotic stress that can affect host plants and associated insects should be considered in risk assessments of transgenic plants used for environmental remediation. In the present study, we identified the biodiversity and composition of arthropod communities in sunflower fields without treating plots with any inorganic or organic contaminants. Further studies under contaminated environmental conditions are needed to provide valuable insights to support the development of guidelines for assessing potential risks posed by transgenic plants to insect ecosystems.


This research was supported by a grant (NIE-A-2021-04) from the National Institute of Ecology (NIE) funded by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE), Republic of Korea.


Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.



Aken B.V. Transgenic plants for enhanced phytoremediation of toxic explosives . Current Opinion in Biotechnology20, 231-236 , 10.1016/j.cop-bio.2009.01.011 .


Bennett L.E , Burkhead J.L , Hale K.L , Terry N , Pilon M , Pilon-Smits E.A.H. Analysis of trans-genic Indian mustard plants for phytoremediation of metal-contaminated mine tailings . Journal of Environ-mental Quality32, 432-440 , 10.2134/jeq2003.4320 .


Butt A , Ain Q , Rehman K , Khan M.X , Hesselberg T. Bioaccumulation of cadmium, lead, and zinc in agriculture-based insect food chains . Environmental Monitoring and Assessment190, 698 , 10.1007/s10661-018-7051-2 .


Chen M , Zhao J.Z , Ye G.Y , Fu Q , Shelton A.M. Impact of insect-resistant transgenic rice on target insect pests and non-target arthropods in China . Insect Science13, 409-420 , 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2006.00071.x-i1 .


Compuzano E.F , Ibarra-Núñez G , Machkour-M´Rabet S , Morón-Ríos A , Jiménez M.L. Diver-sity and seasonal variation of ground and understory spiders from a tropical mountain cloud forest . Insect Science27, 826-844 , 10.1111/1744-7917.12693 .


Conner A.J , Glare T.R , Nap J.P. The release of genetically modified crops into the environ-ment . Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. The Plant Journal33, 19-46 , 10.1046/j.0960-7412.2002.001607.x .


Dar M.I , Green I.D , Naikoo M.I , Khan F.A , Ansari A.A , Lone M.I. ( 2017 ). Assessment of biotransfer and bioaccumulation of cadmium, lead and zinc from fly ash amended soil in mustard-aphid-beetle food chain . Science of the Total Environment584-585, 1221-1229. doI:10.1016/j.scitotenv..01.186 .


Dively G.P. Impact of transgenic Vip3A × Cry1Ab Lepidopteran-resistant field corn on the nontarget arthropod community . Environmental Entomology34, 1267-1291 , 10.1093/ee/34.5.1267 .


Duan J.J , Head G , McKee M.J , Nickson T.E , Martin J.W , Sayegh S.F. Evaluation of dietary effects of transgenic corn pollen expressing Cry3Bb1 protein on a non-target ladybird beetle, Coleomegilla maculate . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata104, 271-280 , 10.1023/A:1021258803866 .


Ferry N , Mulligan E.A , Majerus M.E.N , Gatehouse A.M.R. Biotrophic and tritrophic effects of Bt Cry3A transgenic potato on beneficial, non-target, beetles . Transgenic Research16, 795-812 , 10.1007/s11248-007-9088-9 .


Canberra: Grains Research and Development Corporation. Retrieved April 1, 2020 from , .


Metro Manila, Philippines: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications. Retrieved February 1, 2021 from ,


Khaliq A , Javed M , Sohail M , Sagheer M. Environmental effects on insects and their population dynamics . Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies2, 1-7 .


Seoul: Korea Meteorological Administration. Retrieved December 30, 2020 from ,


Lee J.R , Choi W , Jo B.H , Kim I.R , Moon J.C , Shin S.Y , et al. Ministry of Environment’s Guide to Safety Management of Living Modified Organisms . SejongKorea: Ministry of Environment, National Insti-tute of Ecology .


Seocheon, Korea: LMO Environmental Safety Center. Retrieved March 2, 2021 from ,


Margalef R. Information theory in ecology . Genetic System3, 36-71 .


McNaughton S.J. Relationship among function-al properties of California grassland . Nature216, 168-169 , 10.1038/216168b0 .


Moir M.L , Brennan K.E.C , Majer J.D , Fletcher M.J , Koch J.M. Toward an optimal sampling protocol for Hemiptera on understorey plants . Journal of Insect Conservation9, 3-20 , 10.1007/s10841-004-2351-y .


MOTIE. ( 2001 , Mar ). Transboundary Movement, etc . of Living Modified Organisms Act (Act No. 6448 of Mar. 28as Amended up to Act No. 15181 of . 12, 2017). Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. Retrieved ch 2, 2021 from .


Nam K.H , Han S.M. Seed germination of sunflower as a case study for the risk assessment and management of transgenic plants used for environ-mental remediation in South Korea . Sustainability12, 10110 , 10.3390/su122310110 .


Nam K.H , Han S.M , Lee J.R , Park J.H , Choi W , Jung Y.J , et al. Establishment of LMO Risk Assessment System and Operation of the Institute of LMO Risk Assessment under the Jurisdiction of the Ministry of Environment . SeocheonKorea: National Institute of Ecology .


Nam K.H , Kim Y.J , Moon Y.S , Pack I.S , Kim C.G. Salinity affects metabolomics profiles of differ-ent trophic levels in a food chain . Science of the Total Environment599-600, 198-206 , 10.1016/j.scito-tenv.2017.05.003.


Nam K.H , Han S.M , Lee J.R , Park J.H , Choi W , Jung Y.J , et al. Establishment of LMO Risk Assess-ment System and Operation of the Institute of LMO Risk Assessment under the Jurisdiction of the Ministry of Environment . SeocheonKorea: National Institute of Ecology .


Incheon, Korea: National Institute of Biological Resources. Retrieved December 30, 2020 from , .


Jeonju, Korea: Rural Development Administration. Retrieved April 1, 2020 from ,


Oh S.D , Park S.Y , Chang A , Lim M , Park S.K , Suh S.J. Influences of insect-resistant geneti-cally modified rice (Bt-T) on the diversity of non-target insects in an LMO quarantine field . Korean Journal of Breeding Science50, 406-414 , 10.9787/KJBS.2018.50.4.406 .


Peralta-Videa J.R , Lopez M.L , Narayan M , Saupe G , Gardea-Torresdey J. The biochemistry of environmental heavy metal uptake by plants: Implica-tions for the food chain . The Internationa Journal ofAnalysis of Arthropods in Sunflower Fields Biochemistry Cell Biology41, 1665-1677 , 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.03.005 .


Pielou E.C. Shannon’s formula as a measure of specific diversity, its use and misuse . The American Naturalist100, 463-465 .


Pielou E.C. ( 2007 ). Ecology diversity . New York: Wiley.PrasadM.N.V. (). Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) - A potential crop for environmental industry. Hella, 30, 167-174 , 10.2298/HEL0746167P .


Prince S.P.M , Senthilkumar P , Subburam V. Mulberry-silkworm food chain - A templet to assess heavy metal mobility in terrestrial ecosystems . Environmental Monitoring and Assessment69, 231-238 , 10.1023/a:1010715606097 .


Rizwan M , Ali S , Rizvi H , Rinklebe J , Tsang D.C.W , Meers E , et al. Phytomanagement of heavy metals in contaminated soils using sunflower: a review . Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technolo-gy46, 1498-1528 , 10.1080/10643389.2016.1248199 .


Sharkir M.M , Ahmed S. Seasonal abundance of soil arthropods in relation to meteorological and edaphic factors in the agroecosystem of Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan . Internal Journal of Biometeorology59, 605-616 .


Sharma H.C , Pampapathy G. Influence of transgenic cotton on the relative abundance and damage by target and non-target insect pests under different protection regimes in India . Crop Protection25, 800-813 , 10.1016/j.cropro.2005.11.002 .


Swart R.C , Pryke J.S , Roets F. Optimising thesampling of foliage arthropods from scrubland vegeta-tion for biodiversity studies . from scrubland vegeta-tion for biodiversity studies. African Entomology25, 164-174 , 10.4001/003.025.0164 .


Wang M , Guan X. The effects of phytase transgenic maize on the community components and diversity of arthropods . Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomol-ogy23, 1228-1234 , 10.1016/j.aspen.2020.09.001 .


Whitehouse M.E.A , Wilson L.J , Fitt G.P. A comparison of arthropod communities in transgenic Bt and conventional cotton in Australia . Environmental Entomology34, 1224-1241 , 10.1093/ee/34.5.1224 .


Yi Z , Jinchao F , Dayuan X , Weiguo S , Axmach-er J.C. A comparison of terrestrial arthropod sampling methods . Journal of Resources and Ecology3, 174-182 , 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2012.02.010 .


Zhang Z.S , Lu X.G , Wang Q.C , Zheng D.M. Mercury, cadmium and lead biogeochemistry in the soil-plant-insect system in Huludao City . Bulle-tin Environmental Contamination and Toxicology83, 255-259 , 10.1007/s00128-009-9688-6 .


Zhu H , Wang D , Wang L , Fang J , Sun W , Ren B. Effects of altered precipitation on insect commu-nity composition and structure in a meadow steppe . Ecological Entomology39, 453-461 , 10.1111/een.12120 .


Zuo L , Yang R , Zhen Z , Liu J , Huang L , Yang M. ( 1956 ). A 5-year field study showed no apparent effect of the Bt transgenic 741 poplar on the arthropod community and soil bacterial diversity . Scientific Reports8 , 10.1038/s41598-018-20322-3 .