바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Search Word: Ecosystem services, Search Result: 2
1
Jenn-Kuo Tsai(Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute) ; Chi-Ling Chen(Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute) 2022, Vol.3, No.1, pp.7-12 https://doi.org/10.22920/PNIE.2022.3.1.7
초록보기
Abstract

Farming practices that balance environmental friendliness with biodiversity are increasingly valuable. Wild plants on farmlands compete for nutrients with crops and create a crucial microhabitat and resources for animals such as natural enemies. Investigating farmlands and their surrounding plants with limited human and material resources has become an essential aspect of evaluating the agricultural ecosystem services. This study investigated plants in six agricultural long-term ecological research sites in Taiwan from 2017 to 2020 to determine the ideal season for investigation. Cluster analysis was performed to group habitats with similar plant composition, and the species–area curves of the clusters in each season were created. The results indicated that the agricultural ecosystem could be divided into farmlands, banks, orchards, and tea gardens. The habitats were divided into farmland, bank, Chia-Yi orchard, Gu-Keng orchard, and tea garden clusters. Ground plant cover can be investigated all year with at least 18 quadrats. However, if human and material resources are limited, 10 quadrats should be the minimum for farmlands in autumn and for the other microhabitats in spring. The minimum number of quadrats is 10 for banks, 17 for orchards, and 9 for tea gardens.


2
Woong-Bae Park(Department of Biological Science, Kongju National University) ; Siae Park(Department of Biological Science, Kongju National University) ; Tae-Jun Choi(Department of Biological Science, Kongju National University) ; Dae-Hee Kim(Department of Biological Science, Kongju National University) ; Do-Hee Lee(Department of Biological Science, Kongju National University) ; Yuno Do(Department of Biological Science, Kongju National University) 2022, Vol.3, No.2, pp.97-102 https://doi.org/10.22920/PNIE.2022.3.2.97
초록보기
Abstract

In this study, 4,136 pictures posted on a social media platform were analyzed to discover wetlands that are worth visiting to experience our cultural values. Pictures from 300 of the 2,499 listed wetlands have been posted in South Korea. Proximity of a wetland was the most important criterion, regardless of the type of wetlands that were visited. People visited wetlands at the time and season when they were good for recreational activities. Most of the subjects in the pictures were the visitors and natural scenery of a wetland. There was no correlation observed between the wetland conditions and the number of pictures taken by the visitors. Sightseeing and leisure activities are a significant part of various ecosystem services offered by wetlands, but most of the visitors seem to be unaware that the place they have visited is a wetland. Therefore, wetland awareness programs are needed, even for wetlands close to the residential areas that many people have already visited in this study.


Proceedings of the National Institute of Ecology of the Republic of Korea